Eastminster's Inadequate Response

A comprehensive analysis of institutional failures and demands for accountability

The Investigation: Promise vs. Reality

What They Promised

  • Independent investigation
  • Transparency with findings
  • Support for survivors
  • Institutional accountability

What They Delivered

  • Investigator is current church member
  • Restricted access with geographic barriers
  • Forced return to site of abuse
  • Acknowledgment of 2000-2006 failures

Eight Specific Failures

How Eastminster's response perpetuates institutional harm

1

Restricted Access

Only victims and current members can view 6-page summary. Full report hidden.

Impact: Prevents community awareness and protection

2

Geographic Barriers

Requires out-of-state survivors to travel to Wichita to read findings.

Impact: Discriminates against distant survivors

3

No Public Disclosure

Refuses to release redacted version to protect broader community.

Impact: Leaves potential victims uninformed

4

Investigator Conflict

Used current member Randy Coffman to conduct 'independent' investigation.

Impact: Compromises investigation integrity

5

Timing Restrictions

No access permitted until after their June 22nd 'Service of Lament'.

Impact: Controls survivor narrative

6

Incomplete Outreach

Dozens of potential victims were never contacted or interviewed.

Impact: Minimizes scope of abuse

7

Continued Secrecy

Full report (100-200 pages) with evidence remains completely hidden.

Impact: Protects institution over survivors

Impact on Survivors

Retraumatization

Forcing survivors to return to Eastminster - the site of their abuse - to learn about other victims' experiences. This requirement shows a fundamental lack of trauma-informed care.

Geographic Discrimination

Survivors in Dallas, Kansas City, Michigan, Boston, Washington and other locations cannot easily access findings about their own abuse and that of their peers.

Community Vulnerability

Neighbors, teachers, colleagues who may have been abused elsewhere by Bodie Weiss have no access to information that could validate their experiences.

Institutional Protection

Lack of transparency protects church leadership who may have enabled or covered up abuse, preventing accountability for those who failed to act.

Six Specific Demands for Accountability

What survivors need from Eastminster Presbyterian Church

1

Immediate Public Release

Publish a redacted version of the investigation summary that protects victim identities while informing the community about the scope and nature of abuse.

2

Full 2000-2006 Disclosure

Publicly acknowledge what church leadership knew in 2000 and 2005, who was involved in decision-making, and why abuse was dismissed rather than reported.

3

Independent Re-investigation

Commission a truly independent investigation by GRACE or similar organization not affiliated with Eastminster Presbyterian Church.

4

Broader Victim Outreach

Actively reach out to all former youth group members from 1989-2003, not just those who responded to initial contact attempts.

5

Systemic Changes

Implement comprehensive child protection policies and submit to ongoing external oversight from an independent organization.

6

Community Notification

Alert other churches, schools, and organizations where Bodie Weiss worked about confirmed abuse patterns to protect potential victims.

Legal and Ethical Context

Why These Demands Matter

  • Prevention: Other institutions need this information to protect children
  • Validation: Survivors deserve acknowledgment of institutional failures
  • Justice: Those who dismissed reports must be held accountable
  • Healing: Transparency is essential for survivor recovery
  • Reform: Only through truth can meaningful change occur

Precedent for Transparency

Other religious institutions have successfully implemented transparent accountability processes:

  • • Southern Baptist Convention's abuse database
  • • Catholic Church diocesan lists of credibly accused
  • • GRACE investigations with public reports
  • • Independent review boards with survivor representation

Take Action Now

Every day of continued secrecy causes additional harm to survivors and potentially puts others at risk.